✓ verbatim from the press ? no verbatim passage
Visual evidence collected by The New York Times suggests Israel used white phosphorus — a highly controversial incendiary substance — in populated areas of Lebanon during clashes with Hezbollah. Characteristic smoke trails were identified on May 30 in Nabatieh, a city of 40,000 inhabitants, as well as other locations like Tyre, Qlayaa, Khiam and Yohmor in recent months. ✓
Press quotes (1)
"Rastros de fumaça característicos desse tipo de munição foram vistos recentemente, em 30 de maio, em Nabatiyeh, uma cidade com cerca de 40 mil habitantes, em imagens de redes sociais verificadas pelo jornal americano"
White phosphorus is not banned under international law, but its use in populated areas raises complex legal questions. Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (1980) — to which Lebanon is a signatory but Israel is not — prohibits air-delivered incendiary weapons against any military objective located in a concentration of civilians. The International Committee of the Red Cross expressed in 2022 "serious concern about the humanitarian consequences of the use of incendiary weapons, including white phosphorus munitions" and urged states "to avoid any use of incendiary weapons against military objectives within a concentration of civilians." ?
Press quotes (1)
"The ICRC, like many others, has repeatedly expressed serious concern about the humanitarian consequences of the use of incendiary weapons, and of weapons with incidental incendiary effects, such as white phosphorus munitions... we urge all States and all parties to armed conflict to avoid any use of incendiary weapons against military objectives within a concentration of civilians, as a matter of policy, in light of the significant likelihood of indiscriminate effects of such uses."
Human Rights Watch analyzed in March 2026 that "the use of airburst white phosphorus is unlawfully indiscriminate in populated areas and does not meet the legal requirement to take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian harm," regardless of stated purpose. The organization acknowledges that white phosphorus "can be used for multiple purposes, including to obscure, mark, signal, or directly attack military personnel and materiel," but warns that "concerns over its use in populated areas are amplified by the technique shown in videos of air-bursting white phosphorus projectiles, which spread 116 burning felt wedges impregnated with the substance over an area between 125 and 250 meters in diameter." ?
Press quotes (1)
"Under international humanitarian law, the use of airburst white phosphorus is unlawfully indiscriminate in populated areas and does not meet the legal requirement to take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian harm."
The Israel Defense Forces deny violations, stating to the NY Times that "the procedures of the Israel Defense Forces require that such projectiles not be used in densely populated areas, except in some cases. This is in compliance with the requirements of international law and goes beyond them." Israel uses U.S.-made 155mm M825A1 artillery shells designed to create smoke screens that protect fighters for five to ten minutes. ✓
Press quotes (1)
"Os procedimentos das Forças de Defesa de Israel exigem que tais projéteis não sejam usados em áreas densamente povoadas, salvo algumas exceções. Isso está em conformidade com as exigências do direito internacional e vai além delas", afirmou em comunicado."
NY Times verified visual evidence of white phosphorus use in several Lebanese cities
Covered by only some sources, or where the accounts diverge.
Covered by only some sources (1)
Israel uses American M825A1 155mm projectiles with 116 felt wedges coated with white phosphorus
-
What was the specific purpose of white phosphorus use in the documented incidents?
Why it's still unknown: Israel did not comment on specific incidents questioned by NY Times, providing only general guidelines
-
How many civilians were directly affected by the white phosphorus attacks?
Why it's still unknown: No source reports casualty numbers or specific damage caused by the incidents
-
What will be the formal response from Lebanon or international bodies to the incidents?
Why it's still unknown: Sources do not report official reactions from the Lebanese government or international organizations to the specific documented cases