✓ verbatim from the press ◦ composed from multiple sources
Former Minas Gerais governor and presidential pre-candidate Romeu Zema (Novo party) stated at a National Industry Confederation (CNI) event this Monday (22nd) that he intends to require male Bolsa Família beneficiaries to complete their education and undertake technical courses, but would not make the same demand of women because they "have other duties at home." According to Zema, the country is "creating a generation of good-for-nothings" — an expression that drew applause from the audience of businesspeople present at the event in Brasília. ✓
Press quotes (2)
"O ex-governador de Minas Gerais e pré-candidato à Presidência Romeu Zema (Novo) afirmou nesta segunda-feira que sua proposta de exigir estudos até o Ensino Médio para beneficiários de programas sociais não valeria para mulheres, que, segundo ele, "têm outras atribuições em casa"."
"o país está "criando uma geração de imprestáveis"
"I target men primarily. Women have other duties at home, have children, have a very big difference compared to men," said Zema, as reported by multiple outlets. The pre-candidate stated that male beneficiaries "are invited to work, and people don't go for a very simple reason: they have the security of receiving a benefit." He defended requiring male beneficiaries who haven't completed high school or don't have professional technical courses to complete their education. ◦
Press quotes (1)
"As mulheres têm outras atribuições em casa, têm filhos, têm uma diferença muito grande com relação aos homens. Mas os homens hoje são convidados a trabalhar, e estou falando de pessoas de 25 anos, 30, e as pessoas não vão por um motivo muito simples: elas têm a segurança de receber um benefício"
Zema also proposed creating a R$5,000 prize for people who leave Bolsa Família after getting a formal job. "When he is registered with minimum wage, he starts contributing R$300 per month to the government. That is, a difference of R$900. I will give a prize of R$5,000, which is paid off in five or six months," stated the former governor. Currently, Bolsa Família rules do not prevent beneficiaries from being employed — the program considers family income to define continuation or exit. ✓
Press quotes (2)
"Na hora em que ele está registrado com um salário mínimo, passa a recolher R$ 300 por mês para o governo. Ou seja, é uma diferença de R$ 900. Eu vou dar um prêmio de R$ 5.000, que em cinco ou seis meses está quitado."
"Atualmente, porém, as regras do Bolsa Família não impedem que beneficiários estejam empregados. O programa considera a renda familiar para definir a permanência ou saída das famílias atendidas."
A study by the Institute of Applied Economic Research (Ipea) published in 2025 indicates that the minimum Bolsa Família value of R$600 per household does not represent a generalized disincentive to formal employment. "The increase in benefits did not generate an incentive for workers to migrate from formal to informal jobs," says an excerpt from the survey cited by Exame. According to the research, evasion from jobs only occurs in informal occupations considered precarious, such as domestic workers without registration. ◦
Press quotes (2)
"O aumento do benefício não gerou um incentivo para que os trabalhadores migrassem de empregos formais para informais"
"A evasão de postos de trabalho só ocorre, segundo a pesquisa, em ocupações informais consideradas precárias, a exemplo das trabalhadoras domésticas sem registro."
Bolsa Família is a federal program regulated by Law 14,601/2023 and subsequent federal decrees. Zema, as a state governor, would not have direct authority to alter program conditionalities without coordination with the federal government — the legal feasibility of the proposal was not detailed by the pre-candidate during the event. He also defended broad privatizations, pension reform, administrative reform, and hourly-paid work as an alternative to labor law (CLT). ✓
Press quotes (1)
"Zema também defendeu o regime de trabalho pago por hora trabalhada, uma alternativa à CLT (Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho)."
Zema stated he would require education and technical courses from male Bolsa Família beneficiaries, but not from women, justifying that women 'have other duties at home'
Zema used the expression 'generation of good-for-nothings' to refer to social program beneficiaries, receiving applause from the business audience
Zema proposed creating a R$5,000 prize for those who leave Bolsa Família after getting formal employment
Covered by only some sources, or where the accounts diverge.
Covered by only some sources (4)
Ipea study from 2025 shows that R$600 Bolsa Família does not represent a generalized disincentive to formal work
FGV research shows that more than 68% of young Bolsa Família beneficiaries left the program by 2025
Zema referenced the Banco Master case during the event, stating that 'ghosts know who to appear to'
Zema defended hourly-paid work as an alternative to CLT and criticized the proposal to end the 6x1 schedule
-
Did Zema present a specific legal instrument (bill, federative agreement) to enable a state governor to alter Bolsa Família conditionalities?
Why it's still unknown: None of the consulted outlets reported details about the legal feasibility of the proposal. Bolsa Família is a federal program (Law 14,601/2023) and conditionalities are defined by federal decree — it is unclear whether the proposal presupposes coordination with the federal government, a bill in Congress, or if it is a programmatic statement without a defined legal instrument.
-
What is the constitutional basis for requiring educational requirements exclusively from men, excluding female beneficiaries?
Why it's still unknown: The proposal differentiates conditionalities by gender without outlets reporting legal analysis on compatibility with art. 5, I of the Federal Constitution (equality between men and women) or with international human rights treaties. There is no mention of technical opinions, legislative consultancies, or positioning from constitutional law experts on the viability of the proposed distinction.
-
Are there precedents for cash transfer programs in Brazil or internationally that condition benefits on gender in a manner analogous to Zema's proposal?
Why it's still unknown: None of the consulted outlets presented a survey of national or international precedents for gender-differentiated conditionalities in social programs. Impact evaluations of similar policies or positioning from international organizations (World Bank, UN Women, ECLAC) on this type of policy design were also not reported.
-
What is the empirical basis for Zema's claim that male beneficiaries are systematically refusing formal job offers?
Why it's still unknown: Zema stated, without presenting the data source according to Exame, that men prefer to 'do odd jobs' and maintain benefits instead of accepting formal jobs. Data from the Unified Registry, the Ministry of Labor, or academic studies quantifying refusal of formal offers by Bolsa Família beneficiaries disaggregated by gender were not reported.